skip to main | skip to sidebar
Global Labour Column Archive
  • HOME
    • ABOUT US
    • GLC ANTHOLOGIES
  • LINKS
    • RECOMMENDED SITES
    • DISCLAIMER
  • AUTHORS
  • GLOBAL BOARD
  • CONTACT
  • GLU
  • ICDD
  • Follow Us on Twitter
  • Monday, December 12, 2016

    Reflecting on electoral catastrophe: What lessons can we take away from the victory of Trump?

    Peter Evans
    Trump’s minions have already made it clear that organised labour will be among their immediate targets. Public sector workers, who are the main pillar of organised labour’s strength, will be attacked early. Turning the National Labor Relations Board into a thoroughly anti-labour organisation will make union certification, via officially sanctioned elections, close to impossible. Another obvious agenda item is a national ‘right to work’ law which will remove the requirement that workers represented by a union pay membership dues. I will not try to exhaust the list of likely attacks here, although projecting the disastrous details of Trump’s regime will be a crucial part of figuring out how to mount some kind of defense.

    Trying to think about how it might be possible to change the political landscape is a different sort of task. It requires a careful debate on the structural circumstances that produced so many Trump voters. Theories of ‘The Trump Voter’ abound, and sorting them out will require a careful analysis of exit polls that has yet to be done. But two preliminary themes have already emerged. 


    The first centers on the ‘basket of deplorables’: Trump gave racists, white nationalists, xenophobes and misogynists a clear champion and they responded. The second is the ‘revenge of the rustbelt’ theme: having been pounded by neo-liberal capitalism, white working class men (and many women) finally found someone who was not part of the political establishment and would condemn the full gamut of established politicians (Democratic or Republican) that working class voters held responsible for their declining communities and beleaguered families.

    Racism and xenophobia were fundamental to Trump’s success, but the electoral effectiveness of racism was constructed in the course of the campaign. Survey data shows racism among white Americans holding steady or decreasing over the last quarter of the 20th century and the early years of the 21st century. Trump’s shameless exploitation of racism for political advantage built an explicitly racist xenophobic constituency and rode it to power. If there is anyone left in the ranks of organised labour who doubts that labour must make a priority of fighting racism and xenophobia in order to defend its long term collective interests, the success of Trump’s strategy should be a wake-up call.

    Responding to racism and xenophobia is essential, but ignoring the economic dynamics of disaffection would be a head-in-the-sand mistake. The economic shifts propelled by neo-liberal capitalism have, for half a century, pounded the economic well-being and self-esteem of the working class (understood not as former industrial workers but as all ordinary workers). No one denies that the real minimum wage has fallen by a third in the past half-century, after having increased more than two and a half times in the past 30 years. Those who joined the workforce in the mid-20th century expected their economic well-being would improve over the course of their working lives. For the lowest-paid workers, wages fell instead. Real household incomes for the majority of U.S. households are lower today than they were at the turn of the millennium. The shrinking life expectancy of the least-educated white Americans (about 4 years of decrease between 1990 and 2008) is a hard indicator that the globalised economy is delivering negatives, not positives.

    U.S. voters are not economic reactionaries. When they had the opportunity, in the 2016 election, to endorse positions clearly in the economic interests of working people, they generally responded positively. They voted to increase the minimum wage in all four states where it was on the ballot. A proposal to reduce the minimum wage in South Dakota was crushed by a 71% margin, despite the fact that voters simultaneously chose Trump over Hillary at 60% to 30%.

    Nonetheless, the contradiction between expectations of better lives and disappointing economic realities creates anger. The political question is where the anger is directed. The Occupy movement fingered the 1% whose incomes rose obscenely, but had a harder time dramatising the fact that the rising incomes of the 1% and the distress of the 99% were a natural product of the fact that the global economy is a system run in the interests of large corporations (a.k.a. global capital) - corporations that have an interest in minimising their expenses (a.k.a. workers’ wages) and therefore in making sure that workers’ incomes don’t rise too fast. The anti-capitalist extension of Occupy never made it into political debates. Advancing the proposition that a capitalist economy - dominated by those whose wealth and incomes come from their ownership of (primarily financial) property - might be the culprit for the woes of ordinary Americans goes beyond of the limits of what the U.S. political establishment is willing to consider.

    The lack of debate over globalisation is a telling example. Democratic politicians, long before Bill Clinton and extending seamlessly to Obama, have faithfully argued that a global capitalist economy benefits everyone, and that therefore trade agreements that reduce ‘government interference’ in the flow of global investment and trade are good for the people of Michigan and Wisconsin. Careful economic analysis does not support this claim, but liberal political elites follow the Chamber of Commerce anyway. Bernie Sanders, one of the few who felt free to be a heretic, won both Wisconsin and Michigan in the democratic primaries. Hillary was a post-Sanders convert to trade skepticism. Trump took full advantage of her latecomer status.

    Once the anti-capitalism option is off the table, the disaffected find other targets. Blaming immigrant workers of colour is a simple option. ‘The government’ is a long standing favourite American target. Putting the blame on the government is a theme that comes through clearly in the exit polls. Only a third of all 2016 voters, Democratic or Republican, felt positive about their government, and only one out of six among these – 5% of all voters – were enthusiastic. Seven out of ten voters felt negative toward their government and two thirds of these described themselves as ‘angry’. Of those who were negative, about four out of five voted for Trump. Liberal political elites, including Hillary, make it easier for people to believe that their woes are the government’s fault because they avoid critiquing capitalism.

    What about the labour movement? Faithful support for the Democratic Party has seemed like the only option given the rapacious reaction that prevails among their Republican opponents. But this strategy has resulted in only the most limited defensive victories. At the same time, labour’s political clout has been gradually undercut by declining union membership and relentless ideological attacks. This year represented a new 21st century low in the effects of union membership on elections. Union households are now a minor portion of the electorate, and in 2016 the votes of union households were more similar to those of non-union households than in any other election for a generation.

    To improve its lot, labour must take the sources of Trump’s success and turn them around. If racism and xenophobia are key resources for reaction, the energy and determination of workers of colour are key resources for the labour movement. The success of Las Vegas Culinary Union Local 226 in the 2016 election in Nevada illustrates the point. The Culinary is not only the largest union in Nevada. It is also the largest immigrant organisation and the largest African-American organisation in Nevada. The Culinary’s 60 000 members knocked on 350 000 doors and talked to 75 000 voters. They helped turn a ‘battleground state’ into one of the few bright spots of 2016. Trump lost the state and Nevada elected the first Latina to the U.S. Senate.

    The second thread is more controversial, but may well be unavoidable. Fighting for the immediate interests of members must always be the foundation of labour’s struggles, but without an overarching political analysis that goes beyond electing liberal politicians, labour will always be on the defensive. Lack of an anti-capitalist analysis robs progressives in the labour movement of the sharp edge that they need in order to energise the angry and disaffected. If established political elites are unwilling to offer an analysis that critiques the consequences of private economic power, labour may have no choice but to take the initiative in introducing the debate. Who better than the labour movement to blame the power of corporate capital for the failure to deliver sustained improvements in welfare to ordinary Americans?

    The debate over what is to be done is just getting started. Its contours will shift as the specifics of the Trump regime’s attacks are revealed. One thing is clear: the ability of the labour movement to formulate and execute a counter-strategy will be a key determinant of how bad things get and for how long.


    Download this article as pdf

    Peter Evans is an associate fellow in the Global Labour University network. He taught Sociology for many years at the University of California, Berkeley and earlier at Brown University and is now an Emeritus Professor. He has published articles on the global labour movement and is also known for his work on the political economy of development, exemplified by his 1995 book Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation and his more recent work on the 21st century developmental state 

    Posted in: Free Trade,Globalisation,Labour Movement,Neoliberalism,Social Democracy,Trade Unions,United States
    Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook
    Newer Post Older Post Home

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Share

    Twitter Facebook Stumbleupon Favorites More

    Subscribe to the Mailing List

    If you want to subscribe to the GLC mailing list, please click here or send an empty email to "List-GLColumn-subscribe@global-labour-university.org"

    Contribute to the GLC

    If you want to contribute to the Global Labour Column, please read here the Guidelines for Contributions

    Languages






    Donations

    More Info

    Popular Posts

      T-Shirt Economics: Labour in the Imperialist World Economy
      Chinese Construction Companies in Africa: A Challenge for Trade Unions
      Ruskin, the trade union college, is under siege

    TAGS

    Trade Unions Financial Crisis Workers' rights Globalisation Neoliberalism Labour Market Collective Bargaining Decent Work Inequality Labour Standards Wage Social Movements Europe Development Strategies Struggle Progressive alliances Strike Growth Labour Labour rights Financial Market Tax Financial Regulation Social Security Public Investment Social Democracy South Africa Economic Democracy Fiscal Space Germany Informal Economy Corporate Governance Freedom of Association ILO Minimum Wage United States Competitiveness Human Rights Labour Movements Trade Union Austerity Central Bank Environment Free Trade Free Trade Agreement Greece Labour Movement Social Protection State Funding Transnational Solidarity Unemployment Vietnam Workers’ Rights Crowd Work Domestic Workers Economic Crisis Education Employment Forced Labour France Global Warming Labour Market Flexibility Labour Statistics Migration National Minimum Wage Public Works Programmes Trade Union Divisions Workers' unity Agriculture Brexit Care Work Construction Sector Cooperatives Crisis Economic Alternatives Economic Reform Farmworkers Financialisation Globalization Indonesia Just Transition Labour Process Liberalisation Macroeconomic Policy NUM Nationalism Occupational Health Organising Outsourcing Portugal Privatisation Refugees Regulation Reserve Army of Labour Right to strike Social Dialogue Social Justice Solidarity Tax Evasion Welfare State Workers Rights Workers’ Organisations AMCU Africa Alternative Sources of Power Anti-privatisation Anti-union Violence Automobiles Brazil Business and Human Rights Capital Flight Capitalism Chinese Investment Climate Change Collectivity Colombia Community Monitoring Conference Corporate Transparency Coup Cuba Debt Restructuring Decriminalisation Demand Democracy Developed and Developing Countries Development Digitisation Disciplining of the superfluous labour force Domestic Work Economic Development Egypt Elections Entrepreneurship Eurozone Crisis Executive Compensation Factory Occupations Fair Trade Farm Workers Feminism Finance Financial Crises Financial Innovation Financial crisis. Fiscal Austerity Food Sovereignty G20 Gender Gentrification Global Health Global Multiplier Great Depression Great Recession Hawkers Health Hotel Housekeepers Human Rights due Diligence India Industrial Relations Informal Employment Institutions International Aid Policy International Framework Agreements Investment Partnership (TTIP) Investment Partnerships Iran Korean Shipbuilding Industry Kuznets Labor Labour Broking Labour Income Share Labour Markets Labour Reform Leadership Left Legislation Loi Travail Macroeconomic Performance Management Manufacturing Marshall Plan Metal Workers Migrant Domestic Workers Militarised Capitalism Mineworkers NASVI National Health Service Neolibaralism Networking New Progressive Consensus Online Campaigning Options for the Euro Area Paternalism Patriarchy Pensions Performance Standards Political Alliances Poverty Reduction Precariousness Prison Labour Prisoners Private Plantations Progressive Tax Reform Protectionism Protests Public Policy Quebec Racism Rank-and-File Member Redistribution Regulation of Labour Rent Seeking Rural Development Ruskin SEWA Securitization Sex Work Shadow Banking Shaft Stewards Social Audit Social Development Social Movement Social Transformation Solidarity Economy Spain Sportswear Industry State Stellenbosch Street Trading Street Vendors Strike Ban Strikes Structural Changes Supply Chains Swedish Model Tertiary Education Top Income Shares Tourism Trade Liberalisation Trade Misinvoicing Transatlantic Trade Transformation Transparency Transport Trump Tunsia Turkey Unfree Labour Union 4.0 Union Strategy Unions Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Voluntary Initiatives Wage Employment Wage Inequality Wage Share West Africa Wild Cat Strike Winelands Women Women’s Movement Workers` Organization Youth

    PUBLICATIONS

    Click here to view more

    Blog Archive

    • ►  2020 (1)
      • ►  September (1)
    • ►  2017 (40)
      • ►  December (4)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (5)
      • ►  July (4)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ▼  2016 (34)
      • ▼  December (3)
        • Reflecting on electoral catastrophe: What lessons ...
        • Trump and the Losers of Globalisation and Modernis...
        • The global economic slowdown
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (2)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (1)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2015 (32)
      • ►  December (2)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (5)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (1)
    • ►  2014 (32)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (1)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (3)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (2)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2013 (41)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (5)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (4)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (4)
    • ►  2012 (35)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (3)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2011 (39)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (3)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2010 (39)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (4)
      • ►  May (1)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2009 (5)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)

     
    Copyright © 2011 Global Labour Column Archive | Powered by Blogger
    Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | 100 WP Themes