skip to main | skip to sidebar
Global Labour Column Archive
  • HOME
    • ABOUT US
    • GLC ANTHOLOGIES
  • LINKS
    • RECOMMENDED SITES
    • DISCLAIMER
  • AUTHORS
  • GLOBAL BOARD
  • CONTACT
  • GLU
  • ICDD
  • Follow Us on Twitter
  • Sunday, August 25, 2013

    The Crisis, Structural Reform and the Fortification of Neoliberalism in Europe

    Christoph Hermann
    The European Commission President, Jose Manuel Barroso, recently made the recommendation that fiscal consolidation (read “austerity”!) must continue in Europe, and that the European Union (EU) member states “should now intensify their efforts on structural reforms for competitiveness”. He specifically highlighted the need for comprehensive labour market reforms as “the best way to kick-start job creation”.[1] The call for structural reform to supplement austerity policies is not new. A number of EU member states have introduced far-reaching institutional reforms during the crisis – several of them under pressure from the European Central Bank, the European Commission and the International Monetary Fund. Structural reforms differ from regular austerity measures since their main goal is to change the country’s institutional framework to allegedly boost economic growth.

    In the following paragraphs we summaries major structural reforms that we have found in eleven EU member states that were strongly affected by the crisis.[2]


    State sector employment

    The state sector (especially state sector employment) is a popular site for financial consolidation and structural reform. The Greek government is aiming to reduce public employment by a third. The United Kingdom (UK) government has also articulated this position, aiming to shed almost half a million public sector jobs until 2014. In countries we have analysed, most job cuts are planned in education and health care; while the UK simply dismisses public sector workers, other countries shrink the workforce primarily through the non-replacement of retirees, or through voluntary dismissals. After a temporary ban on new hiring, only every tenth state sector employee is meant to be replaced in Greece. In Romania this applies to every seventh and in Italy to every fifth worker who leaves the state sector. Job cuts are also frequently combined with wage cuts and pay freezes. Thus, while thousands of jobs were axed, Greece and Spain also increased working time for the remaining state sector workers.

    While state sector reforms were accompanied by a reduction of public expenses, other reforms had no immediate effect on public finances. The aim of these reforms was, instead, to unleash a process of internal devaluation, which would supposedly increase the country’s competitiveness, attract investments, create jobs and boost growth. In Greece and Ireland, internal devaluation included lowering the national minimum wage – in Greece by 22 per cent, and in Ireland by 12 per cent (in Ireland, the cut was reversed after a change in government). While cuts in minimum wages are an exception, a number of countries have introduced minimum wage freezes, and some, the possibility for companies to unilaterally cut wages for a limited period.

    Labour markets

    Labour markets are a popular target of structural reforms during the crisis and a number of countries have relaxed regulations on fixed-term employment. Greece and Spain have also introduced new employment contracts for younger (and in the case of Spain, unskilled) workers. These contracts extend for a period of two years and pay between 75-80 per cent of the national minimum wage. However, workers under these contracts do not only earn less, but they can also be laid off at any time, without being eligible for unemployment benefits. These workers can also be dismissed without reason during probation. Hence, some countries have extended the probation period, with the example of Greece extending it from two months to one year.

    As part of the flexibilisation agenda, other changes have also made it easier to lay off workers. Special protection for vulnerable groups such as pregnant women, or workers on sick leave, have been relaxed, notice periods have been shortened, and severance pay has been cut back. Thus, new barriers have been introduced to struggles against unfair dismissals; and mass layoffs have been made easier (see table 1, below).



    TABLE 1: Labour market reforms

    EE=Estonia, EL=Greece, ES=Spain, IE=Ireland, IT=Italy, LT=Lithuania, LV=Latvia, HU=Hungary, PT=Portugal, RO=Romania, UK=United Kingdom. 
    Source: Own elaboration.
    Collective bargaining
    There has been a dramatic change in collective bargaining systems, where various measures implemented enable a profound decentralisation, and an erosion of collective bargaining systems. These are indicated in table 2, below.

    Decentralisation has been imposed in three different ways: Firstly, countries have abandoned national or sector-wide collective agreements. Secondly, they have eradicated the “favourability” principle, which stipulates that in the case of multiple collective agreements, the regulations that prevail are those that grant the most favourable conditions for the workers. With the suspension of this principle, employment and working conditions are now easily determined at company level. Thirdly, countries have promoted decentralisation through the granting of exceptions and exemptions, as well as the acceptance of deviations from sectoral standards.

    Decentralisation is complemented by a weakening of bargaining institutions. A number of countries have suspended (or severely restricted) extension procedures through which agreements concluded by one (or more) employer organisations and unions are made binding for entire sectors or regions. Collective bargaining systems have also suffered from the elimination (or shortening) of the “after effect” whereby regulations remain in force after agreements expire.

    The crisis has also encouraged governments to interfere in collective bargaining in other ways. In Greece and Romania, new legislation limits the duration of collective agreements to three and two years respectively. In both cases, the International Labour Organisation has criticised the changes since they violate the principle of free bargaining. The erosion of the bargaining systems is complemented by a weakening of trade union representation. In Greece, for example, company agreements can now be negotiated by non-union affiliated staff representatives.



    TABLE 2: Reform of collective bargaining

    EE=Estonia, EL=Greece, ES=Spain, IE=Ireland, IT=Italy, LT=Lithuania, LV=Latvia, HU=Hungary, PT=Portugal, RO=Romania, UK=United Kingdom. Source: Own elaboration.
    Structural reform and redistribution of wealth
    The structural reforms adopted during the crisis have generally expanded the possibilities for companies to increase profits at the expense of workers; despite the upward redistribution of wealth, from labour to capital, the outcome of austerity and structural adjustment for growth and recovery has, so far, been miserable.

    With the exception of Britain (whose growth perspectives are nonetheless rather fragile), none of the countries covered in this analysis have made up for the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) losses incurred since the start of the crisis. Greece has suffered from five straight years of economic contraction, and lost about a quarter of its GDP. Negative or slow growth is complemented by record-high unemployment and a growth in absolute poverty and material deprivation. However, while support for austerity seems to weaken in the wake of continuously negative growth forecasts, Brussels is determined to continue and accelerate its structural reform agenda. The result of this policy is a fortification of neo-liberalism in Europe.

    [1] Jose Manuel Barroso, Press Conference Brussels. 29 May 2013.

    [2] For the full study (in German) see: Hermann Christoph and Karl Hinrichs, ‚Die Finanzkrise und ihre Auswirkungen auf Sozialstaaten und Arbeitsbeziehungen – ein europäischer Rundblick‘, Austrian Chamber of Labour, Vienna, http://media.arbeiterkammer.at/wien/PDF/studien/Forba-Studie_Finanzkrise_2012_neu.pdf


    Download this article as pdf

    Christoph Hermann is a senior researcher at the Working Life Research Centre, Vienna, and a lecturer at the University of Vienna (Austria).

    Posted in: Collective Bargaining,Europe,Financial Crisis,Labour Market,Neoliberalism
    Email This BlogThis! Share to X Share to Facebook
    Newer Post Older Post Home

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Share

    Twitter Facebook Stumbleupon Favorites More

    Subscribe to the Mailing List

    If you want to subscribe to the GLC mailing list, please click here or send an empty email to "List-GLColumn-subscribe@global-labour-university.org"

    Contribute to the GLC

    If you want to contribute to the Global Labour Column, please read here the Guidelines for Contributions

    Languages






    Donations

    More Info

    Popular Posts

      T-Shirt Economics: Labour in the Imperialist World Economy
      Chinese Construction Companies in Africa: A Challenge for Trade Unions
      Ruskin, the trade union college, is under siege

    TAGS

    Trade Unions Financial Crisis Workers' rights Globalisation Neoliberalism Labour Market Collective Bargaining Decent Work Inequality Labour Standards Wage Social Movements Europe Development Strategies Struggle Progressive alliances Strike Growth Labour Labour rights Financial Market Tax Financial Regulation Social Security Public Investment Social Democracy South Africa Economic Democracy Fiscal Space Germany Informal Economy Corporate Governance Freedom of Association ILO Minimum Wage United States Competitiveness Human Rights Labour Movements Trade Union Austerity Central Bank Environment Free Trade Free Trade Agreement Greece Labour Movement Social Protection State Funding Transnational Solidarity Unemployment Vietnam Workers’ Rights Crowd Work Domestic Workers Economic Crisis Education Employment Forced Labour France Global Warming Labour Market Flexibility Labour Statistics Migration National Minimum Wage Public Works Programmes Trade Union Divisions Workers' unity Agriculture Brexit Care Work Construction Sector Cooperatives Crisis Economic Alternatives Economic Reform Farmworkers Financialisation Globalization Indonesia Just Transition Labour Process Liberalisation Macroeconomic Policy NUM Nationalism Occupational Health Organising Outsourcing Portugal Privatisation Refugees Regulation Reserve Army of Labour Right to strike Social Dialogue Social Justice Solidarity Tax Evasion Welfare State Workers Rights Workers’ Organisations AMCU Africa Alternative Sources of Power Anti-privatisation Anti-union Violence Automobiles Brazil Business and Human Rights Capital Flight Capitalism Chinese Investment Climate Change Collectivity Colombia Community Monitoring Conference Corporate Transparency Coup Cuba Debt Restructuring Decriminalisation Demand Democracy Developed and Developing Countries Development Digitisation Disciplining of the superfluous labour force Domestic Work Economic Development Egypt Elections Entrepreneurship Eurozone Crisis Executive Compensation Factory Occupations Fair Trade Farm Workers Feminism Finance Financial Crises Financial Innovation Financial crisis. Fiscal Austerity Food Sovereignty G20 Gender Gentrification Global Health Global Multiplier Great Depression Great Recession Hawkers Health Hotel Housekeepers Human Rights due Diligence India Industrial Relations Informal Employment Institutions International Aid Policy International Framework Agreements Investment Partnership (TTIP) Investment Partnerships Iran Korean Shipbuilding Industry Kuznets Labor Labour Broking Labour Income Share Labour Markets Labour Reform Leadership Left Legislation Loi Travail Macroeconomic Performance Management Manufacturing Marshall Plan Metal Workers Migrant Domestic Workers Militarised Capitalism Mineworkers NASVI National Health Service Neolibaralism Networking New Progressive Consensus Online Campaigning Options for the Euro Area Paternalism Patriarchy Pensions Performance Standards Political Alliances Poverty Reduction Precariousness Prison Labour Prisoners Private Plantations Progressive Tax Reform Protectionism Protests Public Policy Quebec Racism Rank-and-File Member Redistribution Regulation of Labour Rent Seeking Rural Development Ruskin SEWA Securitization Sex Work Shadow Banking Shaft Stewards Social Audit Social Development Social Movement Social Transformation Solidarity Economy Spain Sportswear Industry State Stellenbosch Street Trading Street Vendors Strike Ban Strikes Structural Changes Supply Chains Swedish Model Tertiary Education Top Income Shares Tourism Trade Liberalisation Trade Misinvoicing Transatlantic Trade Transformation Transparency Transport Trump Tunsia Turkey Unfree Labour Union 4.0 Union Strategy Unions Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Voluntary Initiatives Wage Employment Wage Inequality Wage Share West Africa Wild Cat Strike Winelands Women Women’s Movement Workers` Organization Youth

    PUBLICATIONS

    Click here to view more

    Blog Archive

    • ►  2020 (1)
      • ►  September (1)
    • ►  2017 (40)
      • ►  December (4)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (5)
      • ►  July (4)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2016 (34)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (2)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (1)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2015 (32)
      • ►  December (2)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (5)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (1)
    • ►  2014 (32)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (1)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (3)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (2)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ▼  2013 (41)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (5)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ▼  August (1)
        • The Crisis, Structural Reform and the Fortificatio...
      • ►  July (4)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (4)
    • ►  2012 (35)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (3)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2011 (39)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (3)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2010 (39)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (4)
      • ►  May (1)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2009 (5)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)

     
    Copyright © 2011 Global Labour Column Archive | Powered by Blogger
    Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | 100 WP Themes