skip to main | skip to sidebar
Global Labour Column
  • HOME
    • ABOUT US
    • GLC ANTHOLOGIES
  • LINKS
    • RECOMMENDED SITES
    • DISCLAIMER
  • AUTHORS
  • GLOBAL BOARD
  • CONTACT
  • GLU
  • ICDD
  • Follow Us on Twitter
  • Wednesday, June 16, 2010

    More pay and more jobs: how Brazil got both

    Paulo Eduardo de Andrade Baltar
    So far, the 21st century has been good to many Brazilians. Formal employment and the minimum wage have risen, the purchasing power of those earning average pay has recovered, open unemployment has fallen, and undocumented subcontracting has been curbed. Average household incomes have risen and poverty has declined. Positive macroeconomic developments, a range of progressive government policies and improved collective bargaining outcomes have all played a part in this.[1]
    Purchasing power regained
    Under the two successive presidencies of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (“Lula”), income inequality in Brazil has shown just a small decrease, from a Gini index of 0.58 in 2002 to 0.55 in 2008. Much more significant is the marked change in the labour market configuration, which has had a very positive impact on poverty levels. From 61.4 million people in 2003, the number living in poverty dropped to 41.5 million in 2008 (a cut from 34.3% to 21.9% of the total population). Those in absolute poverty fell from 26.1 million in 2003 to 13.9 million in 2008 (from 14.6% to 7.3%).
    The recovery in the purchasing power of the minimum wage has been crucial here. It really gained momentum from 2005 on, when the federal government made an explicit commitment to promoting it. Between 2003 and 2008, the minimum wage rose faster than inflation, providing workers at the base of the income pyramid with significant real gains (38.3%). The government established a policy of annual adjustment that takes account of past inflation and adds up the average GDP growth of the two previous years. There has also been an important, though smaller, increase in the real median wage. Its purchasing power rose by 23.5%.
    Formalising jobs
    The increase in the average growth rate of GDP over the period 2004-2008 had significant positive impacts. The labour market absorption of working age people increased and unemployment went down. At the same time, the relative weight of informal employment, self-employment and unpaid work declined. The proportion of formal employment in the whole economically active population (including the unemployed) aged 15 and above increased from 36.1% in 2004 to 40.9% in 2008. There was an especially significant increase in the formalisation of youth jobs. This is important, as formalisation brings workers within the effective scope of labour law and social security provisions. More than 95% of the formal jobs created are on open-ended contracts. However, this does not imply job security. Brazilian employers have great flexibility in hiring and firing. For example, in 2009, in the midst of the crisis, just under a million formal jobs were created within a total of 33 million employees registered in Brazil. But that was the net job creation figure. There were 15.2 million dismissals as well as 16.2 million new hires.
    Recent Brazilian experience contradicts the frequent assumption that a minimum wage will lead to net job losses and inflationary pressures. Rather, it points to the importance of public regulation of the national labour market. In Brazil, employees who are formally hired cannot be paid less than the established legal minimum. But the minimum wage is also a reference point for most informal workers and many of the self-employed. And its revaluation has had a positive influence on wage negotiations, especially on setting wage floors for some occupational categories.
    Income transfers
    Social security provisions have been a further important means of income distribution. A non-contributory scheme brought in for rural workers has helped to put them on an equal footing with urban workers, and a Continuous Money Benefit has ensured an income for some particularly disadvantaged groups. In both cases, the benefit cannot be below the value of the minimum wage (in line with the general social security guidelines for retirement or survival benefits). But the explicit policy of revaluing the minimum wage has not worsened social security deficits, as the good performance of the economy and the expansion of formal jobs have boosted the system’s revenues. On the other hand, the increased purchasing power of the rural pensioners and other poor beneficiaries has resulted in increased disposable income within the country’s smaller communities, especially those in the long-impoverished North-East. More effective social security coverage has also indirectly helped to improve the labour market, as a guaranteed income for senior citizens enables them to stop seeking work. And it allows some dependent minors to avoid premature entry into the labour market, thus reducing the incidence of child labour.
    The various conditional income transfer schemes have been grouped into one single Family Grant programme which now covers more than 11 million families. It transfers a monetary supplement to families with an insufficient income per capita to avoid situations of extreme deprivation. In return, they agree to maintain their children’s and teenagers’ school attendance, seek medical care for expectant mothers and newborn babies and withdraw their children from child labour. This programme is intended as temporary support, allowing family members some time to seek better labour market insertion. However, even during the period of economic growth and employment expansion in 2004-2008, the vast majority of the families were unable to meet the conditions for leaving the programme.
    Unemployment insurance is another important safety net. Despite the employment expansion in 2004-2008, the number of people drawing unemployment benefits actually rose. This was because the greater formalisation of jobs, which increased the number of those covered by unemployment insurance, was not accompanied by a reduction in employee turnover. The increased expenditure on unemployment pay-outs also stemmed from the real increase in the minimum wage, as the minimum benefit is equal to the statutory minimum wage.
    Unemployment benefits helped to maintain households’ spending power during the worst period of the economic crisis, between the end of 2008 and the beginning of 2009. The benefits have also been contributing to the promotion of decent work in Brazil, as they are payable to workers who are rescued from slave-like employment relationships, during the time it takes to reinsert them into the labour market.
    The role of trade unions
    Although it has seven recognised trade union centres and more than 1,600 unions, the Brazilian labour movement has been demonstrating greater unity in action in recent years. Even during the crisis of 2008-2009, a large proportion of the occupational categories managed to bargain up the purchasing power of their wages. The negotiating climate has changed significantly since 2003. Rights are no longer being bargained away in exchange for the maintenance of employment. The relaunch of Brazil’s development agenda has increasingly shifted the union focus to winning back lost rights and making broader demands – notably for a 40-hour week.
    The unions’ relationship with government has also moved forward, facilitated by President Lula’s social origins and the 1988 constitutional provisions for greater policy participation by the social actors.
    A real development agenda
    The Brazilian labour market still faces considerable structural problems, but opportunities do exist for sustained development in the coming years. It should be characterised by a policy of economic growth, an active industrial policy, coordination of efforts to solve the infrastructural problems, respect for the environment, expansion of the public services, the linking up of production chains, investment in science and technology, and restructuring of the State. Provided employment can be generated, there is also the possibility of extending public labour regulation and social protection. Public institutions should be strengthened as a way of fighting labour market fraud. ILO Convention 158 on termination of employment should be applied in order to counter unjustified exemption mechanisms. Although Brazil ratified this Convention in 1995, it pulled out of it again in 1996. A trade union reform should be brought in, so as to increase the representativeness of the unions and secure their organising rights in the workplace. Also crucial is continuity in the policy of revaluing wages, particularly the legal minimum wage.
    Brazil can and should create a development model that distributes income and dignifies citizens.
    1 Baltar et al, Moving towards Decent Work. Labour in the Lula government: reflections on recent Brazilian experience, Berlin 2010.

    Download this article as pdf

    Paulo Eduardo de Andrade Baltar is a researcher at the Centre for Labour Economics and Trade Unionism - CESIT – in the Institute of Economics of the State University of Campinas – UNICAMP – Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil

    Additonal readings
    GLU Working Paper No.9: Moving towards Decent Work. Labour in the Lula government: reflections on recent Brazilian experience; May 2010; by Paulo Eduardo de Andrade Baltar, Anselmo Luís dos Santos et al
    or in Portuguese
    GLU Working Paper No.9: Trabalho no governo Lula: uma reflexão sobre a recente experiência brasileira; May 2010; by Paulo Eduardo de Andrade Baltar, Anselmo Luís dos Santos et al

    Posted in: Labour Market,Social Security,Trade Unions,Wage
    Email This BlogThis! Share to Twitter Share to Facebook
    Newer Post Older Post Home

    0 Comments:

    Post a Comment

    Share

    Twitter Facebook Stumbleupon Favorites More

    Subscribe to the Mailing List

    If you want to subscribe to the GLC mailing list, please click here or send an empty email to "List-GLColumn-subscribe@global-labour-university.org"

    Contribute to the GLC

    If you want to contribute to the Global Labour Column, please read here the Guidelines for Contributions

    Languages






    Donations

    More Info

    Popular Posts

      T-Shirt Economics: Labour in the Imperialist World Economy
      Ruskin, the trade union college, is under siege
      Chinese Construction Companies in Africa: A Challenge for Trade Unions

    TAGS

    Trade Unions Financial Crisis Workers' rights Globalisation Neoliberalism Labour Market Collective Bargaining Decent Work Inequality Labour Standards Wage Social Movements Europe Development Strategies Struggle Labour Progressive alliances Labour rights Strike Growth Financial Market Tax Financial Regulation Social Democracy Social Security Public Investment South Africa Economic Democracy Fiscal Space Germany Informal Economy Corporate Governance Freedom of Association Human Rights ILO Minimum Wage Unemployment United States Austerity Competitiveness Greece Labour Movements Trade Union Brexit Central Bank Employment Environment France Free Trade Free Trade Agreement Labour Movement Labour Statistics Migration Social Protection Solidarity State Funding Transnational Solidarity Vietnam Workers’ Rights Brazil Crisis Crowd Work Domestic Workers Economic Alternatives Economic Crisis Education Forced Labour Global Warming Labour Market Flexibility National Minimum Wage Nationalism Occupational Health Organising Public Works Programmes Regulation Supply Chains Trade Union Divisions Workers' unity Agriculture Care Work Climate Change Construction Sector Cooperatives Democracy Economic Reform Elections Farmworkers Financialisation Gig economy Globalization Indonesia Just Transition Labour Process Labour Reform Liberalisation Macroeconomic Policy NUM Outsourcing Portugal Precariousness Privatisation Protests Refugees Reserve Army of Labour Right to strike Sex Work Social Dialogue Social Justice Tax Evasion Welfare State Women Workers Workers Rights Workers’ Organisations AI AMCU Academic Labour Africa Algorithms Alliances Alternative Sources of Power Anti-privatisation Anti-union Violence Automobiles Banking Bolivia Brazilian Institutions Britain Business and Human Rights Canada Capital Flight Capitalism Cavite EPZ Chinese Investment Climate Jobs Collectivity Colombia Community Monitoring Conference Corporate Accountability Corporate Responsibility Corporate Transparency Coup Cuba Data Debt Restructuring Decriminalisation Demand Developed and Developing Countries Development Digital Imperialism Digital labour Digitisation Disciplining of the superfluous labour force Domestic Work Drug Dealing E-commerce Economic Development Economy Egypt Entrepreneurship Ergonomics Eurozone Crisis Executive Compensation Export Processing Zones Factory Occupations Fair Trade Farm Workers Feminism Fertility Markets Finance Financial Crises Financial Innovation Financial crisis. Fiscal Austerity Food Sovereignty Future of work G20 Gender Gentrification German Social Democratic Party Global Health Global Multiplier Grassroots Organising Great Depression Great Recession Hawkers Health Hong Kong Hotel Housekeepers Housing Human Rights due Diligence Immigrants India Industrial Impact Industrial Relations Informal Employment Informality Institutions International Aid Policy International Framework Agreements Investment Partnership (TTIP) Investment Partnerships Iran Israel Korean Shipbuilding Industry Kuznets Labor Labour Broking Labour Income Share Labour Law Labour Markets Labour Party Labour Relations Leadership Left Legislation Loi Travail Macroeconomic Performance Management Manufacturing Marshall Plan Metal Workers Migrant Domestic Workers Militarised Capitalism Mineworkers Morales NASVI National Health Service Neolibaralism Networking New Progressive Consensus Online Campaigning Options for the Euro Area Paternalism Patriarchy Pension Reform Pensions Performance Standards Political Alliances Poverty Reduction Precarity Prison Labour Prisoners Private Plantations Progressive Tax Reform Protectionism Public Policy Quebec Racism Rank-and-File Member Redistribution Regulation of Labour Renewables Rent Seeking Reproductive Labour Resistance Rural Development Ruskin SEWA Securitization Shadow Banking Shaft Stewards Social Audit Social Development Social Movement Social Transformation Solidarity Economy Spain Sportswear Industry State Stellenbosch Street Trading Street Vendors Strike Ban Strikes Structural Changes Surrogacy Swedish Model Syriza Technology Tenants' Union Tertiary Education Top Income Shares Tourism Trade Liberalisation Trade Misinvoicing Transatlantic Trade Transformation Transnational Unionism Transparency Transport Trump Tunsia Turkey Unfree Labour Union Union 4.0 Union Strategy Unions Unite the Union Universal Health Coverage (UHC) Voluntary Initiatives Wage Employment Wage Inequality Wage Share West Africa Wild Cat Strike Winelands Women Women’s Movement Work Schedules Work and Family Workers` Organization World Economic Forum Youth

    PUBLICATIONS

    Click here to view more

    Blog Archive

    • ►  2019 (10)
      • ►  December (1)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (1)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  April (1)
    • ►  2018 (18)
      • ►  December (1)
      • ►  November (1)
      • ►  October (1)
      • ►  July (1)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (1)
    • ►  2017 (40)
      • ►  December (4)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (5)
      • ►  July (4)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2016 (34)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (2)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (4)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (1)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2015 (32)
      • ►  December (2)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (5)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (2)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (3)
      • ►  January (1)
    • ►  2014 (32)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (1)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (3)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ►  June (6)
      • ►  May (2)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (2)
      • ►  February (2)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2013 (41)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)
      • ►  October (5)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (1)
      • ►  July (4)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (4)
    • ►  2012 (35)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (2)
      • ►  May (4)
      • ►  April (3)
      • ►  March (3)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ►  2011 (39)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (4)
      • ►  October (3)
      • ►  September (4)
      • ►  August (3)
      • ►  July (2)
      • ►  June (3)
      • ►  May (3)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (2)
    • ▼  2010 (39)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (5)
      • ►  October (4)
      • ►  September (2)
      • ►  August (2)
      • ►  July (3)
      • ▼  June (4)
        • Why the Stability and Growth Pact does not work
        • More pay and more jobs: how Brazil got both
        • Crisis of Distribution, not a Fiscal Crisis
        • Beyond neoliberalism?
      • ►  May (1)
      • ►  April (4)
      • ►  March (4)
      • ►  February (4)
      • ►  January (3)
    • ►  2009 (5)
      • ►  December (3)
      • ►  November (2)

     
    Copyright © 2011 Global Labour Column | Powered by Blogger
    Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | 100 WP Themes